Meta-analytic dataset containing results of primary studies examining the effect of practice facilitation on the uptake of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in primary care settings.
Format
A data frame with 23 rows and 3 variables:
- author
first author and publication year of primary study report.
- score
score on a scale from 0 to 12, for which higher scores correspond to higher quality of the study methods.
- design
study design, with CCT = controlled clinical trial, C-RCT = cluster randomized controlled trial, RCT = randomized controlled trial.
- allocation_concealed
indicator for allocation concealment.
- blinded
indicator for whether study was single- or double-blinded.
- intent_to_treat
indicator for whether study adhered to intent-to-treat principle.
- outcome
description of outcome measure.
- follow_up
months of follow-up.
- retention_pct
percentage of sample retained at follow-up.
- SMD
effect size in form of Hedges' g.
- SE
corresponding variance of the effect size.
Source
Table 1 of Baskerville et al. (2012; doi:10.1370/afm.1312 ).
References
Baskerville NB, Liddy C, Hogg W (2012). “Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings.” Annals of Family Medicine, 10(1), 63–74. ISSN 1544-1717. doi:10.1370/afm.1312 .